Ga. judge jails Muslim woman over head scarf
Valentine’s husband, Omar Hall, said his wife was accompanying her nephew to a traffic citation hearing when officials stopped her at the metal detector and told her she would not be allowed in the courtroom with the head scarf, known as a hijab.
Hall said Valentine, an insurance underwriter, told the bailiff that she had been in courtrooms before with the scarf on and that removing it would be a religious violation. When she turned to leave and uttered an expletive, Hall said a bailiff handcuffed her and took her before the judge.
I am outraged! She wasn’t even in court, she was turning to leave and the bailiff handcuffed her!!
She’s serving 10 days for observing her religious rights? I’ve been to Georgia, but I wasn’t aware of a law that bans head covering in court. Islamaphobes have tried to depict this case as some sort of attempt to impose Islamic law. They continue to demonize the only organization that defends the civil rights of Muslims in America, CAIR. Muslim women in America want the right to practice their religious freedom and enjoy their civil rights. The fact that they court will not accommodate Muslim women who observe their religious code is a clear violation of this country’s principles. How can we be full participants in this society if we cannot even go before a judge? CAIR should not be the only group involved, NAACP, ACLU, and any other organization that cares about equal rights for all citizens.
6 thoughts on “Woman Arrested Over Head Scarf”
I just posted about this in my random thoughts on my blog. I am appalled by this story. Did you happen to look at the comments section? Sickening.
Wow, this is shocking!!!
Pingback: Friday Links — December 19, 2008 « Muslimah Media Watch
OK this is totally off the topic, but congrats on the Honorable Mention. I was hoping you’d win. Next year, eh?
here is the follow-up on that story. and other organizations did get involved with CAIR on this issue. (ADL, ACLU & NAACP) I feel like the judge needs to revise his “rule” and just say that baseball caps and the like will be excluded. to have a blanket rule about any headcovering that requires an auxiliary hearing in another venue each time someone appears before him is ridiculous. i’m guessing the area is not that diverse.
“Islamaphobes have tried to depict this case as some sort of attempt to impose Islamic law.”
The Islamaphobes are stupid. Head covering is *God’s* law, not Islamic law. Women are supposed to cover their heads no matter where they live or what religion they claim.